A Kick In The Pants # 7 – Night Birds

NBFK

I pumped up the Night Birds at the end of last year with an early review of the Midnight Movies 7″, and then again when counting down the best releases of 2010. After seeing them splash, slice, and writhe through a set in some punk’s living room last month, and giving their latest release, the singles collection Fresh Kills Vol. 1 a few dozen spins, it’s time to kick you in the ass again, so that finally the message gets through.

I’ve already given the low down on the sound. 80’s surf punk that roars at you with menace and insanity. Like that crazy guy on the corner, hollering about the end of the world. He’s obviously nuts, but whether the warning or the performance intrigues you, you have to stop and listen. The songs albeit morbid are infectious, and before you hear the last resonating note of their cover of Eddie & The Showmen’s “Squad Car,” you’re ready to hear them all again. “Midnight Movies” and “Bad Biology” pay homage to B-movie icons while stirring up a catchy ruckus, “Killer Waves” isn’t too much on the nose of horror surf, and “Prognosis: Negative” is a hypochondriac’s worst nightmare. “Paranoid Times” might possibly be the most classic 80s punk track of them all – a scathing breakdown of our government, the military, and the fear mongered/mongering that surrounds us in this country. Overall, pretty scary themes that match the intensity of the music.

This disc will catch you up on everything the band has recorded so far, and will hopefully prepare you for the forthcoming full-length. The whistle has blown, the ride is about to begin. Grave Mistake will hook you up with boarding passes.

3 Comments

Filed under A Kick In The Pants, Updates

3 Responses to A Kick In The Pants # 7 – Night Birds

  1. I believe I have a few dcenet tracks that are interpretations of dance styles(a sort of techy, breakbeat, dubstep-like fusion) which you MAYBE have not heard(I say maybe there are always innovators before us). I believe the quality is good, however, a prerequisite you mentioned was having fans, of which I have none .should I bother applying so to speak?

  2. Along with every thing that seems to be building idnsie this specific subject matter, a significant percentage of viewpoints happen to be rather stimulating. Nevertheless, I appologize, but I can not give credence to your whole plan, all be it refreshing none the less. It would seem to everyone that your comments are generally not totally rationalized and in actuality you are generally your self not really completely confident of the argument. In any case I did appreciate reading through it.

  3. The very heart of your writing whslit sounding agreeable at first, did not work very well with me personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the sentences you were able to make me a believer unfortunately only for a very short while. I however have a problem with your leaps in assumptions and you would do well to fill in those breaks. In the event that you actually can accomplish that, I would certainly end up being fascinated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *